This guide compares Reppls and Sapia.ai from both the recruiter and candidate perspectives—helping you determine which platform best fits your hiring needs, workflow, and growth goals.
Overview
Reppls: An AI recruitment platform designed for end-to-end hiring. It combines AI-powered sourcing, intelligent real-time screening, coding assessments, and technical interviews. Built for technical and global hiring, Reppls provides recruiters with deep candidate insights like GitHub activity, LinkedIn profiles, and code contributions, while ensuring transparency at every stage.
Sapia.ai: A conversational AI interview platform specializing in structured text-based screening. Candidates answer a series of chat-style questions, which the AI evaluates for competencies and role fit. Designed to reduce bias, Sapia.ai is especially effective for high-volume hiring in industries like retail, customer service, and hospitality.
What It Feels Like to Use Each
Reppls: Using Reppls feels like having a recruiting co-pilot that handles sourcing, engagement, and evaluations end-to-end. Recruiters set criteria, and Reppls continuously brings in and evaluates candidates. Interviews can be conducted through video, audio, or coding challenges, and results are delivered with full transparency and recruiter control.
Sapia.ai: The experience centers around simplicity and speed. Recruiters send candidates a link to a text-based interview. Candidates complete it on mobile or desktop, and the AI instantly analyzes responses, producing a ranked shortlist. It's low-friction, highly standardized, and built for scale, though less customizable than Reppls.
What Recruiters Actually Get Out of It
Reppls: Recruiters receive a flow of pre-screened, qualified candidates with in-depth profiles and technical validation. ATS integration and APIs allow easy movement of candidates into existing workflows. Recruiters also get transcripts, videos, code results, and AI summaries—all exportable and reusable.
Sapia.ai: Recruiters receive AI-generated scorecards and ranked candidate pools, based on competencies and behavioral analysis. The process requires minimal setup and is ideal for reducing manual screening time. However, it doesn't provide advanced technical validation or multi-channel candidate engagement like Reppls does.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Reppls | Sapia.ai |
|---|---|---|
| AI Sourcing | • Yes – proactive candidate sourcing | • No – candidates apply directly |
| Interview Channel | • Web Browser | • Web Browser • Mobile (chat-based) |
| Interview Type | • Screening • Technical Assessment • Coding Interview | • Structured Chat Interview (text-based Q&A) |
| Hiring Pipeline | • Full end-to-end pipeline | • Partial – focuses on screening & shortlisting |
| Questions | • Pre-configured AI generated • Recruiter-provided • Real-time AI-driven | • Standardized question sets • Competency-based |
| Media Recording | • Video + Audio • Transcript • Downloadable | • Text-based only (no video/audio) |
| Candidate Engagement | • Email • In-App Messaging | • Email • SMS interview links |
| Candidate Transparency | • Yes – full visibility into criteria & feedback | • Partial – candidates receive outcome insights but limited scoring view |
| Candidate Insights | • Resume • AI Interview • GitHub Activity • LinkedIn Profile • Code Contributions | • Resume • Chat Interview • AI Scoring • Behavioral Trait Analysis |
| ATS Integration | • Lightweight (any ATS) • API | • Integrates with major ATS platforms |
| Availability | • 24/7 | • 24/7 |
| Language Support | • 19 Languages | • English + growing support for other languages |
| Pricing | • Subscription • Usage-based | • Enterprise pricing • Role/volume-based |
Candidate Experience
Reppls: Candidates benefit from full transparency—interview questions, evaluation criteria, and feedback are visible. With options for video, audio, or coding interviews in 19 languages, Reppls provides a flexible, inclusive experience. Feedback loops are quick, avoiding the "black box" frustration common in recruiting.
Sapia.ai: Candidates receive a mobile-friendly, chat-style interview that feels conversational and bias-free. However, feedback is limited, and candidates don't see detailed scoring or criteria. While lightweight and user-friendly, it offers less visibility into the process compared to Reppls.
Use Cases & Flexibility
Reppls: Best for technical hiring, enterprise customization, and global recruitment. Ideal for IT, software engineering, and multilingual talent acquisition where technical validation is crucial.
Sapia.ai: Best for high-volume frontline hiring in industries like retail, call centers, and hospitality—roles where speed, scale, and standardized assessments matter most.
Final Verdict
Both Reppls and Sapia.ai bring innovation to AI hiring, but their strengths lie in different domains.
Choose Sapia.ai if you need:
- High-volume, customer-facing role hiring: For retail, call centers, and hospitality positions
- Bias-reducing, standardized candidate assessments: With consistent evaluation criteria
- Lightweight, mobile-friendly candidate experience: That's easy to complete on any device
- Fast ranked shortlists with minimal recruiter effort: For quick decision-making
Choose Reppls if you need:
- A complete end-to-end hiring pipeline: From sourcing → interviews → technical assessments
- Rich candidate insights: Including GitHub, LinkedIn, and coding contributions
- Transparent candidate experience and global language support: With 19 languages available
- Deep system customization and API integration: For enterprise-level flexibility
Looking for a powerful, customizable recruitment pipeline? Explore Reppls